Daca urmati link-ul si va inregistrati pe site-ul F64 Studio beneficiati de reducere la produsele comandate (valoarea reducerii o puteti afla pe site-ul F64 Studio).

Cateva detalii despre test:

• toate obiectivele au fost montate pe aceeasi camera (D300), pe acelasi trepied (in aceeasi pozitie);
• intervalul de fotografiere a tuturor imaginilor a fost de maxim 10 minute, pe o vreme stabila;
• toate obiectivele au avut filtre montate, respectiv: Hoya Protector HD 77mm pe 24-70mm, Hoya UV 72mm pe Nikon 18-200mm, Kenko UV MC 52mm pe Nikon 50mm;
• datorita dimensiunilor obiectivului de 50mm si relativitatii testului, desi s-a respectat exact distanta focala, fotografiile obtinute cu 50mm sunt un pic mai apropiate.

Concluzia testului:
Castigatorul este in mod evident Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8, 50mm f/1.8 depasindu-l (discutabil) doar la f/8 si doar in centrul imaginii (poate si datorita imaginii un pic mai apropiate). Pe colturi 24-70 e parca din alta lume!

General impressions about the lens and for what cameras I think it’s suited, please check the dedicated post: http://blog.adrianmoisei.com/lang/ro/2009/08/nikon-24-70mm-f28/. Now few details about the test:

• all the lens have been mounted on the same camera (D300), on the same tripod (exactly the same position);
• all the images in the test were captured in a 10 minutes time interval, on a stable weather;
• all the lens had filter mounted: Hoya Protector HD 77mm on 24-70mm, Hoya UV 72mm on Nikon 18-200mm and Kenko UV MC 52mm on Nikon 50mm;
• because of the lens size and the relativity of the test, even if the focal length was strictly set, the 50mm lens images are a bit closer (as you can see in the images), giving the 50mm a slight advantage, but not enough to win the test

Test conclusion:
The winner is definitely Nikon 24-70 f/2.8, the 50mm f/1.8 beating it (arguably) only on f/8 and only in the center of the image (maybe because the slightly closer image). On the corners 24-70 is like from another world.